INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship
between context and communication of gospel in India, more specifically, the
role of context in utterance interpretation.
Using different names – Christological terms convey the different
meaning to people according to their religious back group as their world views
are determined by their religious ideology. Christological terms emphasis the
uniqueness of Christ, the necessity of the church, and the obligation to
proclaim the gospel to the whole world. We must emphasize that apologetics
within inter religious contexts is a difficult and sensitive matter that must
be conducted with wisdom, tact and genuine respect for religious others.
Jesus Christ is the center of Christian life and is the
substance of Christ faith. Every Christology is a quest to grasp the content
and explain the meaning of the mystery of Jesus Christ, to discover and
articulate how God is related to humanity and how humanity is related to God in
Jesus Christ. In this context of ongoing life in India where Christians live
and work together with neighbors of other faiths, where a deep seated
theological tolerance coexists with social intolerance. Any attempt to
formulate such a Christology should take into account a fact that acceptance of
a sense of mystery and the other the rejection not an exclusive attitude where
ultimate matters are concerned.
In today’s pluralistic context, the question of the
uniqueness of Christ is constantly being challenged, often from unbiblical
presuppositions. However, we should not diminish the value of Christian dogmas,
as well as we should make sure that our doctrines should not be hindrance to
them to know the love of God.
USING SON OF GOD:
To call Jesus Christ by title the ‘Son of God’ does not mean
for Rammohan Roy that He is God.
If
we describe Jesus as the Son of God, to Hindus, who are majority in India, may
understand this term from the perspectives of family concept of Hindu Gods.
Consequently, it would confer the erroneous picture that Jesus in one of the
member of the God’s family.
Nevertheless it is our responsibility that, we should offer
the gospel that Jesus is equal to God and He is one of God head and He called
as son of God. Through Him, we can access our God as our own father. They all are one in substance and differ in
functions.
USING THE TERM LORD:
The term Lord is very much similar to the Indian context.
Because Indians are bound with the concept of master, jamintar – land lords, Panchait
prathan – head of village.
Moreover, this term Lord are known with it s negative
connotation, because more of these land lords known for their brutality,
injustice, oppression on the low class or caste people. In addition, this term also
may convey a wrong picture of imperialism as the Indian were ruled by the
British.
It shows the necessity of Jesus as Lord in a proper way
without giving any negative annotation.
USING THE TERM CHRIST
AS AVATARA;
In terms of using Christ as avatara, Hindus may understand that Jesus as one of Avatara of Vishu who always take human avatara to destroy the evil doers and to
establish righteousness. But Jesus came to save the sinners. But we should help
the other religious people to distinguish to clear difference between avatara and the incarnation of Jesus
Christ.
SON OF GOD IN ISLAM:
Muslims believe that God is one,
that there are no gods except the God. And they do believe that Jesus is one of
the nabi. To the Muslim, the term Son of God is shirk, blasphemy of the
worst kind.
But Jesus is more than a prophet. He is the Messiah ( John
1:14). Jesus, the Messiah is also the Son of God. Bible, the written Word of
God affirms that “last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed
heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.” Heb 1:1-2. Jesus
Christ is not simple human – ‘nabi’, but He is truly human and truly Divine.
This is the core and kernel of the Christian faith.
Subsequently,
Quran rejects the Sonship of Christ ( Qur’an 2:116, , 161 / 6: 102 -104/ 10:68
/ ). It alleges that the Divine realm is free from human imperfection.
Attributing a Son of God is attributing imperfection to the Divine realm. God
neither can have a son who is human not become a human himself. A son or a
daughter is born as a fruit of the conjugal lobe of a man and woman.
Therefore, when Christians use the term in reference to Jesus, they immediately
assume that the Christians are committing blasphemy by stating that God has
participated in some sort of sexual union with another god – a goddess
wife.
If we sum up, the following of the
reasons for Quaranic rejection of the Sonship of Christ:
Ø “God
begets not, nor is he begotten” (Quran 112:3).
Ø Sonship
is nothing but giving God partners and giving up the very idea of monotheism.
Ø The
Transcendent God cannot have a mortal son through sexual relations with a
mortal consort.
However it is needed to know that the idea of God in flesh is, also, often
expressed in the
Injil by the use of the term “Son” on its own, or the
term “Son of Man.”
According to my personal experience with my Muslim brothers,
it would not be perfect, if you start your conversation with Christ. Instead if
you start with God or creation and finish your conversation with Christ, it will
pave the way to understand the Christ as Second person of God head. Otherwise
it will cause dilemma and religious arguments.
Christ: the redeemer
of humanity:
Jesus, the risen one from the dead, has the power to
liberate from sin and death of this universe. Jesus is Lord, savior and
redeemer through his resurrection: it transforms his exemplary life and his
death into a power which can liberate the chains of sin and death, and makes it
possible of people to enter into the life of the Son of God.
Significantly, Muslims reject the idea of redemption. For
Muslims God is abundantly forgiving. He forgives the repentant sinner. Human
repentance and god’s forgiveness are intimately connected. God’s forgiveness goes even before human
repentance. Their understanding human sinfulness and God’s forgiveness do not
leave any space for a redeemer. Consequently, they find no reason to see Jesus
as redeemer.
Moreover, they do not accept the death of Jesus on the
cross. Because, Muslims brothers and sisters believe that God saved him
miraculously, because, Cod cannot surrender his own envoy to his enemies.
To
the Christian, and according to the Bible, Jesus is the one who alone saves
human being from their sins. Because of the totally depravity of the human
beings, we cannot earn our way to heaven, perform enough good works to please
God, or ever be "sincere enough" in repentance to somehow obtain
forgiveness from God. However God love us though we are sinners. The
ultimate love of Ultimate being was showed on cross through the sacrifice of
His begotten Son for the redemption of His creation.
CONCLUSION:
There is always a danger in communicating gospel to the
people of other faiths. Therefore when we use this kind of terms, we should
know the world views of our audience. Otherwise we will cause negative impact
unintentionally. Consequently we will be the hindrance for them to know the
love of Christ. Therefore let us make sure that let our communication may bring
the proper understanding on God, Jesus Christ. In addition, I vehemently
believe that there is no salvation outside the Christ. So our approach on Jesus
Christ should be based on the Bible as much as possible.
As we are called to the show the love of God, in fulfilling
the commission of God, there is plenty of room for diligence and alertness, but
no room for laziness or privilege (Titus 1:5-9). Let us be always extra careful
about our communications to our fellow brother and sisters who are yet to
experience the love of God.